Now that’s what I call a short and sweet message:
Acting very much like the GOP nominee, Mitt Romney sent a curt message to President Obama today: “Start packing.”
The message, delivered with a chuckle, came in an exclusive interview with “World News” anchor Diane Sawyer who asked the presumptive GOP nominee if he had something to say to the president.
Once again, Obama and Company are on the wrong side of an issue:
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 64% of Likely U.S. Voters rate voter fraud at least a somewhat serious problem in the United States today, and just 24% disagree. This includes 35% who consider it a Very Serious problem and seven percent (7%) who view it as Not At All Serious. Twelve percent (12%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
If we are to have any chance of beating Obama this year, we need to continually point out the difference between his 2008 promises and the way things have turned out. So far, the RNC has shown themselves to be very good at that.
The latest ad (below the fold) has Obama himself saying he’s not going to offer any excuses, and then proceeding to offer excuse after excuse after excuse.
A lot has been said about the Buffett Rule, here and around the blogosphere, and I’ve come to the conclusion that it illustrates a serious blunder on Obama’s part. He made the discussion about tax rates, and therein lies the danger for him.
By talking about rates, he not only opens himself up to discussions of whether or not he himself paid the same rate as his secretary, he also opened up the discussion of other tax plans such as the Fair Tax and the various Flat Tax proposals out there (including Heritage’s and FreedomWorks‘)*. And if Obama wants to make the discussion about fairness, what could be fairer than everyone paying the same rate?
However, the idea of everyone paying the same rate is anathema to a hard-line lefty like Obama, because their real goal is to use the tax code to punish those who have the drive to succeed and become wealthy. Of course, they except their friends on the left (Kennedys, Kerrys) in favor of attacking those on the right who’ve made their money the hard way (Kochs).
When someone like Obama says “the rich” should pay “their fair share,” to them they mean a higher rate than others (note that the Buffett Rule proposes a 30% rate for the rich, when they claim that his secretary only pays a 25% rate. This is where the danger lies for Obama: when the average voter thinks “fair,” they think along the lines of “everyone pays the same rate.”
Unfortunately for Obama, the discussion on rate was pretty much preordained for his discussions on taxes, because he certainly couldn’t talk about absolute tax payments in real dollars. If you compare what Warren Buffett paid in dollars to what his secretary paid in dollars, it would be apparent how much more the rich pay and he’d have been laughed off the stage.
We have a good chance to laugh him off the stage again. What we need is for the candidates, not only for President but for Congress, to hammer home the point that true fairness is everyone paying the same tax rate.
*Please note, I am not saying I’m in favor of any of these tax plans, just pointing out that there are several proposals out there where everyone pays the same basic tax rate.