Tag Archive | pro-life

Third Annual Bowl-A-Thon For… Abortion?

From the really bad optics department comes this one:

Read More…


Sore Loser Democrat Sues Over Election Loss

Folks, this is the face (or should that be farce?) of the Democratic Party today:

When voters in Ohio’s 1st Congressional District threw Democrat Steve Driehaus out of office after only one term, he did not bow out gracefully.  No, he decided to get even.  So he did what anyone does in today’s culture: he sued somebody.

Read More…

Perry: Abortion Is A States Rights Issue

Rick Perry argues on the basis of the Tenth Amendment:

Despite holding personal pro-life beliefs, Texas Gov. Rick Perry categorized abortion as a states’ rights issue today, saying that if Roe v. Wade was overturned, it should be up to the states to decide the legality of the procedure.

Read More…

Holder’s DOJ Takes Elderly Pro-Life Activist To Court

I guess the First Amendment doesn’t apply on a public sidewalk outside an abortion clinic:

A pro-life activist who has engaged in sidewalk counseling for 14 years has been taken to court by the federal Department of Justice.  The complaint to the court submitted by the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice alleges that Richard Retta non-violently obstructed a woman and her ‘clinic escorts’ from entering Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, an abortion facility.

Read More…

Liberty University Offers A “Compromise”

This is an addition to CW’s earlier post. Chancellor Jerry Falwell, Jr. of Liberty University offered a “compromise” to The College Democrats, so that they may keep their charter and remain on campus [Article – Liberty University Democrats group reluctant to accept Falwell proposal].

After reading the referenced article, where does one see the “compromise”?

If Liberty University is a private educational institution, the argument could be made that this is not state-sponsored censorship. However, censorship by any other name is still censorship. All Liberty University is doing is affirming the belief of anti-Christians, that being Christians are intolerant bigots. Blackmailing a group of people whom one disagrees with in the name of compromise is not compromise at all. As long as The College Democrats observe campus regulations and peacefully assert their beliefs, what does it matter which political party they are affiliated with?

The College Democrats constitution reads:

“The College Democrats pledges itself to support the philosophy and candidates of the Democratic Party.” The document further states The College Democrats “will take a pro-life stance and support the traditional form of marriage.”

The only question I have is that what if a Democrat candidate runs on a pro-choice platform? That could invalidate The College Democrats constitution and could be construed as a conflict of interests on the part of the members who have vowed to support their party’s candidates, while at the same time taking a pro-life stance. If there is a campus regulation that specifically states if an organization’s charter proves to be deceptive and/or if it violates and/or conflicts with university policy, that organization may be disbanded.

We’ll see what the outcome of this issue is to be.

What A Difference

Yesterday, I posted about the murder of an abortion provider, and quickly updated it with two statements from pro-life people expressing their sympathy and regret at the violence against a man with whom they disagreed.

Today, we had an Army recruiter murdered, and another wounded, and I can’t find any statement by anti-war groups or people expressing the same sympathy or regret.

Interesting, no?

%d bloggers like this: